• arrow
    LOG IN 
    • Log in using an option below.
         
      Forgot password?
      Login with Facebook
      Sign in with Twitter

  • REGISTER
ABOUT US
Contact Us Who Are We? Hall Of Fame Advertising With PG Games Archive
BEST GAMES
Best games on iPhone Best games on iPad Best games on Android
FREE STUFF
Best free games on iPhone Best free games on iPad Best free games on Android Competitions
GAME SALES
iPhone game sales iPad game sales Android game sales
UPDATED GAMES
Latest iPhone game updates Latest iPad game updates Latest Android game updates
NEW RELEASES
New iPhone games New iPad games New Android games
MORE PG SITES
PG.biz PG FRANCE PG Game Guides PG GameHubs PG Connects 2014
MORE SM SITES
AppSpy Free App Alliance 148 Apps Android Rundown iPhone Quality Index iPad Quality Index Android Quality Index Swipe Magazine Best App Ever Awards
PARTNERS
Metacritic
GameRankings
Pocket Gamer on NewsNow
GamesTracker
dx.net
UK Mobile Pages Directory
Skinflint Price Comparison
iPhone  header logo

Modern Combat: Sandstorm

For: iPhone

Fighting the good fight

Product: Modern Combat: Sandstorm | Developer: In-house | Publisher: Gameloft | Format: iPhone | Genre: Action, Hardcore | Players: 1 | Version: Europe | App version: 1.0
 
Modern Combat: Sandstorm iPhone, thumbnail 1
As every soldier knows, no plan survives contact with the enemy.

War is so fluid that small deviations in timing, location, or weather can have a massive effect on overall victory when hot lead starts flying.

Still, considering how less fluid a touchscreen is compared to the classic keyboard and mouse controls which gave birth to the first person shooter genre, Gameloft's decision to model Modern Combat: Sandstorm on a fairground target range makes complete sense.

On this battlefield, the enemy is static, dumb, with a limited set of moves: spawn; point gun; fire.

Hence, it's a measure of how well the game environments and scripted events are designed that Modern Combat is such an enjoyable experience.

Even when you're replaying levels, whether because you were killed or to improve your fastest time, the canned nature of engagements is never off-putting.

Perhaps the highest praise, however, should be directed towards the touchscreen controls.

They're not perfect. For example, the default option - which has a virtual joypad on the left for strafing movement and a fire button on the right, with mouse-look controlled as you scroll around anywhere on the screen with your thumb - means you're often firing by accident because to see as much of the screen as possible you'll end up inadvertently scrolling across the fire button.

There are two other control methods. Screen Tap doesn't have any onscreen buttons: you move your fingers across the screen to move/look and the fire button moves around under your right thumb. Tap it to fire.

Virtual Sticks has virtual joypads for move and look, and you tap anywhere on the screen to shoot. I didn't find either option helpful, so stuck with the default, but it takes time to get used to.

To be more specific, it's the combination of the controls with the hardcoded actions of the many enemies, who are always popping up out of scenery, that means Modern Combat works so well.

This also influences the way you have to play. Like real warfare, you can't go running around shooting from the hip and expect to survive.

Even taking into account the game's very helpful auto-aiming system (which you can disable), the most sensible way to play is to slowly move around corners, tapping the kneel button (bottom left of the screen) and then zooming in the iron sight (bottom right) to get a solid shooting position that will see the auto-aiming system lock on more accurately.

If you get close to enemies, the game's slow rotational speed means you'll be toast unless you manage to successfully get off a brutal melee blow. It's triggered by proximity: just frantically tap the fire button, which is what you'll be doing anyway.

As for the game's background, you're the chief of a typical squad of generic US soldiers who have been sent to some dusty Middle East location to take down an emerging terrorist threat. So far, so Neocon.

The plot is none too clever, evolving down the lines of 'How did they know we were coming? Oh, our evac chopper's been shot down!' etc. The members of your squad do provide added engagement, though, even if you're not actually saving them, just fulfilling sub-missions to 'Help Dozer on the right flank'.

And you'll always know where to go next thanks to the enormous, green, floating arrow. If only they had those on the battlefield.

Keeping things simple, the pace of the game is also neatly broken up through the ten missions.

You'll be making your way through the town, defending a static location, using fixed machine gun emplacements, acting as an on-rails Hummer gunner, and running through sewers, etc. Thanks to the excellent sniper rifle, the sewers are somehow reminiscent of classic shooter GoldenEye.

Each mission takes anywhere from ten to 25 minutes, depending on how Rambo you are, so you get plenty of game for your seven bucks (or four pounds).

As you'd expect, technically the graphics, audio and animation are up there with the best we've seen on iPhone.

Still, what's really clever is the way Gameloft has shaped the gameplay of Modern Combat: Sandstorm to turn the limitations of the iPhone when it comes to first person shooters - notably the touch controls - into the game's strength.

The battle plan and the enemy may be static, but the victory is emphatic.
 
Modern Combat: Sandstorm
Reviewer photo
Jon Jordan | 7 September 2009
Modern Combat: Sandstorm demonstrates that with good design and control, you can make a very enjoyable first person shooter on iPhone
 
Rate this game >> Average reader score: 
Have Your Say
Post a comment - Please log in to leave a comment
Pocket Gamer Biz     PG Login
Login with Facebook Sign in with Twitter
Show: Latest | Oldest
Joined:
Dec 2008
Post count:
1339
klouud | 22:43 - 21 November 2009
score not game...
Joined:
Dec 2008
Post count:
1339
klouud | 22:43 - 21 November 2009
edit to 2nd to last line - "I retract my previous gripes about the ."
Anonymous | 17:46 - 11 September 2009
someone please help me out on mission 4!!!!
Joined:
Aug 2009
Post count:
3
Vagabond | 03:34 - 9 September 2009
Hurm.

Half-life 2, Unreal Tournament 3, Battlefield 2, ARMA 2, and Left 4 Dead.
Joined:
Dec 2008
Post count:
1339
klouud | 03:00 - 9 September 2009
@jaime -

You make some good points. And you definitely have a right to your own opinion. Personally I found your posts helpful - But sheesh guy!

We are trying to build a community here on PG! Voice your opinions without being overly dramatic, abrasive, and arrogant. I do not agree with Tracy 100% of the time, but I don
Anonymous | 10:58 - 8 September 2009
8 is fair..... best fps yet, best controls and nice graphics. Duke Nukem, Doom and Wolfinstein would all be ace with this setup. Sandstorm is great, Gameloft have done it again!
Anonymous | 09:42 - 8 September 2009
Any plans for a lite?
Joined:
Apr 2009
Post count:
49
PGTracy | 07:36 - 8 September 2009
Console shooters definitely have those features. Resistance, Resistance 2, Killzone 2, Halo 3--all had collectibles. F.E.A.R. 2, Borderlands have weapons upgrades. Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare has weapons upgrades in multiplayer. Same for Battlefield: Bad Company.

What was your point, again?
Anonymous | 06:38 - 8 September 2009
This game deserves at least 9!!!!!!!!!!
Joined:
Oct 2006
Post count:
447
splat | 04:00 - 8 September 2009
Yeah, it can be hard to judge between a 8 and 9, especially when everyone expects you get reviews done yesterday.

Technically however Will I think it deserves an 8. The AI is what it is, but I thought the pacing was good and the gameplay - what you actually do in game - was always the right side of challenging and usually fun.
JOIN THE DISCUSSION: 15 comments >>
 
POPULAR REVIEWS
LATEST COMMENTS
LATEST NEWS
LATEST VIDEOS VIDEO REVIEWS