Mobile  iPhone  Mag  Podcast Pocket Gamer  LOG IN | REGISTER  Twitter     Forum     Contact Us     RSS Feeds
Ad_BlankAd_RLrgBottom_Glu_iPhone
Ad_InstabuyGames_RLrgLower_iPhone
ABOUT US
CONTACT US
WHO ARE WE?
ADVERTISE
GAMES ARCHIVE
NEED HELP?
BUY GAMES
BUY MOBILE GAMES
BUY PSP GAMES
BUY DS GAMES
SPECIAL OFFERS
FREE STUFF
COMPETITIONS
MOBILE GAME DEMOS
PSP GAME DEMOS
DS GAME DEMOS
FRIDAY FREEBIE
OUR SITES
POCKETPICKS
POCKETGAMER.fr
POCKETGAMER.biz
OTHER SITES
FREE BINGO
BINGO SITES
ONLINE BINGO
CHINA WHOLESALE
INDUSTRY
PARTNERS
Metacritic
GameRankings
Pocket Gamer on NewsNow
GamesTracker
dx.net
UK Mobile Pages Directory
GameZone  -
    For Games, reviews, and cheats
iPhone  header logo

 IPHONE NEWS

Mobigame: ‘Edge Games’s open letter is false’

Issues an official reply, right here

Product: Edge (iPhone) | Developer: Mobigame | Genre: Puzzle
Edge Games's open letter to Mobigame is causing quite a stir, as the dispute over the award-winning iPhone game Edge deepens. As we reported earlier on, Tim Langdell's company has struck back at the media forest fire that's torn into him lately over the 'EDGE' trademark and the legal wrangling attached to it, but it seems Mobigame has a very different story to tell.

Mobigame's solicitors have immediately answered the events detailed on the Edge Games website, evidently concerned over the validity of the emails and details revealed. It's calling into question the accusation that Mobigame lied over changing the game's name to Edgy, and that it approached Apple to have the application removed from the App Store.

At the same time, Mobigame is working with its ISP to gather proof that several of the emails published in the open letter were never sent, including the message retracting the demand for 25 per cent of the game's historic earnings.

It's also issued an official reply to Edge Games's open letter, below:

"This is just another example of what we consider to be Mr. Langdell's improper conduct. His "open letter" is addressed to Mobigame but is clearly intended for the games industry at large and contains a number of false statements, manipulations of the truth and fabricated evidence.

"For example it refers to certain conversations that never took place and emails that were not sent (or at least not received). We are gathering evidence in relation to that and our solicitors have responded to Edge Games Inc. I will therefore not go into any more detail except to comment on one specific aspect that I think illustrates the point very clearly."

Langdell says:

"We also wrote to Mobigame's solicitors Sheridans on August 3, 2009 indicating we had just submitted the abandonment of our application for EDGY, and repeating that their client is free to use that mark to change the name of their game to in the US, UK and Germany.

"TO DATE SHERIDANS HAS NOT REPLIED AND MOBIGAME HAS DONE ABSOLUTELY NOTHING ABOUT CHANGING THE NAME OF THEIR GAME TO EDGY OR ANY OTHER NAME SO THAT THEY CAN GET THE GAME ON SALE AGAIN ON iTUNES IN THE US, UK OR GERMANY.

"There could be no greater proof than this that Mobigame lied when they said Edge Games had held them up changing the name of their game to EDGY; Mobigame only said this to make Edge Games look bad -- and to make our CEO personally look bad, too -- and to try to falsely blame us for Mobigame's lost revenues so as to deceive the independent game community into taking pity on Mobigame and siding with Mobigame against Edge Games and Dr Lagndell personally."

In truth, the position in Mobigame's words is this:

"Edge Games Inc. wrote to Sheridans on 3 August 2009 indicating it had just submitted the abandonment of its application for EDGY and stated that he accepted that we were now free to use that mark to change the name of our game to in the US, UK and Germany.

"Neither Sheridans nor us replied but we did make an application to register EDGY as a community trade mark on 4 August 2009 (http://www.ipo.gov.uk/ohim?ohimnum=E8470916). We did not announce that until we obtained confirmation that Edge Games Inc. has withdrawn its USA application.

"No one should be surprised that we did not inform him of this course of action given his company's history in these matters.

"There could be no greater proof than this that Mobigame HAS NOT lied when they said Edge Games had held them up changing the name of their game to EDGY".

"Now that the road is clear for "EDGY" we can look further into the implications of changing the name. However because of the overwhelming support we have had and the fact that we are increasingly finding that legal position favours our continuing use of the name "EDGE" we have to consider this carefully.

"We are clearly not the first and won't be the last to experience these troubles and we do not propose walking away from them. If we do rebrand it will not be because Edge Games has any validity in its claims but because its conduct has made it impossible for us to trade meaningfully otherwise."

As always, we'd love your opinions, as would Mobigames and - perhaps to a lesser extent - Edge Games.

Bookmark and Share

Reviewer photo
Spanner Spencer 12/8/2009
Have your say! Related stories  
Joined:
Mar 2008
Post count:
173
Damien McFerran | 12 August 2009
This became a farce ages ago. I wish a judge would step in and put an end to all this foolishness - you simply should not be able to trademark a commonly-used word in the English language.
Joined:
May 2009
Post count:
115
adi_pie | 12 August 2009
Doesn't Langdell know that writing an entire message with caps is rude?
Anyway I hope this whole thing ends soon, it's getting ridiculous, soon enough someone will be trademarking the word "yes".
Joined:
Mar 2008
Post count:
102
Mr Hearn | 12 August 2009
Affirmative
Joined:
Sep 2008
Post count:
60
Keith Andrew | 12 August 2009
I think Langdell is living on another planet right now. Not sure who he's trying to convince anymore.
Joined:
Feb 2009
Post count:
261
Camzy | 12 August 2009
Langdell is really a despicable person, but unfortunately, the law is actually on his side. The Eurogamer article on this topic told a very complete story, and as much as you might hate the guy, he's worked hard for many years to hold on to his copyright of 'edge.' The thing that annoys people most, is that his company - Edge Games hasn't produced a thing in years. He's just a copyright shark, and I can't wait for him to be taken off the IGDA.
Shin Ho aka Soneet | 12 August 2009
With so many fabrication and the needed time and effort (money) to collect evidence to prove it's fabrication of evidence, shouldn't Edge Games pay lots of money in damages to Mobigames by now? I mean lots? Like, so much they (I mean, him, that one guy) go bankrupt? I would like to see that. I really really want to see this guy taken down to hell.
Prolescum | 12 August 2009
I think this story is quite hilarious and has kept me entertained for quite a time. That said, Langdell is despicable and I genuinely hope mobigame consider not changing the name and finally put an end to his career as the ultimate pilferer of the common era. He thinks he's doing nothing wrong too. Poor IGDA.
Kurokame | 13 August 2009
When things like this come to light it just goes to show what a horrible person Tim Langdell is. Just reading his open letter it was clear he was making himself to look like a saint. The guy is truly a horrible person. It only goes to show what a joke an organization like that IGDA is by having a member like him.
To be honest I'd only heard very little of the IGDA before the Tim Langdell thing. Now however I can't help but think it's a shady group of individuals. Even reading their forums and seeing members talk about how little the IGDA actually does for people who pay them fills me with disgust.
JC | 13 August 2009
Its clear that Tim Langdell does not care about games, his company has done nothing of value since the 1980's i mean who on this board even knew of Edge-game or even a game they made. Tim Langdells company has survived this long simply on licenses that it has got because of the copy right of the name EDGE he should be removed from the IGDA a body which I'm caring less and less about theses days and who's influence has become laughable.

On the plus side this is probably the best PR Edge Games has ever got, i would recommend everyone has a look at there site, which looks like a geo-cities web page, scroll down to the bottom and look at all the Edge related words they have copy-righted. http://www.edgegames.com/

I'm going to go and have a wash now and maybe throw up
Filoski | 13 August 2009
It's funny how Tim Langdell chose to intervene with the EDGE app just as it was placed on the "Apple App Store Turns 1" Top 10 and not during its uprise. If anything Tim Langdell is looking to swindle Mobigame and get his cut of their high grossing product (now that its accumulated a decent revenue). It seems like he was just waiting for the right time to step in and instigate.

As far as I know, trademarking a word or term is farfetched and idiotic. You would think he created the word "edge" (which he certainly didn't). It's time to quit pushing this issue, as entitled as Tim is under the law, and move on.
JOIN THE DISCUSSION: 10 comments >>
Ad_Sanco_MobileClubManager_iPhonenewssponsor
Ad_BriskMobile_iPhone_R1
POPULAR NEWS
LATEST COMMENTS
LATEST DEMOS
Ad_TheDumplingDimension_iPhone_LowerButton
LATEST VIDEOS
LATEST SCREENS