Mobile  iPhone  Mag  Podcast Pocket Gamer  LOG IN | REGISTER  Twitter     Forum     Contact Us     RSS Feeds
Ad_Skin_BlankAd_Leaderboard
Ad_Skin_BlankAd_RLrg
Ad_BlankAd_RLrgBottom_Glu_iPhone
Ad_InstabuyGames_RLrgLower_iPhone
New to Pocket Gamer? Start here!
ABOUT US
CONTACT US
WHO ARE WE?
ADVERTISE
GAMES ARCHIVE
NEED HELP?
BUY GAMES
BUY MOBILE GAMES
BUY PSP GAMES
BUY DS GAMES
SPECIAL OFFERS
FREE STUFF
COMPETITIONS
MOBILE GAME DEMOS
PSP GAME DEMOS
DS GAME DEMOS
FRIDAY FREEBIE
TEXAS CALCULATEM
OUR SITES
POCKETPICKS
POCKETGAMER.fr
POCKETGAMER.biz
OTHER SITES
FREE BINGO
BINGO SITES
ONLINE BINGO
CHINA WHOLESALE
INDUSTRY
MP_gdc10_pg_button
PARTNERS
Metacritic
GameRankings
Pocket Gamer on NewsNow
GamesTracker
dx.net
UK Mobile Pages Directory
GameZone  -
    For Games, reviews, and cheats
  header logo

 GLBENCHMARK NEWS

The top 10 phones in terms of 3D performance revealed

Nokia's N93 is sitting pretty

Product: GLBenchmark | Manufacturer: Kishonti
Regular readers will know we're not shy when it comes to making top 10 lists, such as the ten worst RPG plots, ten reasons why mobile games are completely awesome or the ten most anticipated PSP games of 2008, but when it came to putting together the top 10 phones in terms of 3D performance we really didn't have to do any of the hard work.

Instead, we're relying on the smarts of Hungarian tech company Kishonti, which specialises in measuring the performance of mobile devices. As with the similar benchmarks for different PC graphics cards, its GLBenchmark test runs standardised graphics on a phone and then works out how fast the phone can process them.

There are some caveats, of course. The results given are the test for OpenGL ES 1.0 performance, which is one of the industry graphics standards, so we're not saying these are the best phones for 3D gaming, let alone the best phones for gaming in terms of control or usability, only that this is measure of the device's technical performance when it comes to OpenGL ES 1.0 processing.

Equally, there can be performance differences from phones of different manufacturers depending on how well the test itself is set up – something that got very heated in the PC graphics card battles between Nvidia and ATI. We're not technical enough to know those sort of details about mobiles so we're relying on Kishonti to get this right.

But the list is significant for us consumers in that Nokia's high-end devices hold the top spots with the top three phones all using Texas Instruments' OMAP 2 technology. A couple of Dell's PDAs are listed, while Motorola's Z8 is perhaps a surprise entry at number 8. In comparison, though, the top Sony Ericsson phones only offer around half the 3D performance of Nokia's best, but they're still twice as fast as Nokia's N81 phone (ranked a mere 22nd), which is the company's lead device in terms of the new N-Gage gaming platform.

Anyhow, all excuses aside, this is the breakdown as provided on February 14th 2008, while the number of frames in brackets is the numerical measure of performance as provided via the GLBenchmark test.

1. Nokia N93 (442 frames)
2. Nokia N93i (433 frames)
3. Nokia N95 (413 frames)
4. Dell Axim X51v (412 frames)
5. Nokia N95 8GB (395 frames)
6. Nokia N82 (392 frames)
7. Dell Axim X50v (390 frames)
8. Motorola RIZR Z8 (389 frames)
9. Nokia E90 (386 frames)
=10. SonyEricsson W950i (171 frames)
=10. SonyEricsson M600i (171 frames)
=10. SonyEricsson P990i (171 frames)
=10. SonyEricsson P1i (171 frames)

You can see the full list, which is continually updated as more phones are released, on Kishonti's website.

Bookmark and Share

Reviewer photo
Jon Jordan 15/2/2008
Have your say! Related stories  
Joined:
Jun 2007
Post count:
7
BitRabbit | 15 February 2008
Nothing surprising in this list... All the devices are hardware accelerated, and there are not many more hardware accelerated devices out there.

On Windows Mobile, only some of the Axim have a 3D chip, didn't hear about any smartphones who have.

Concerning the Z8 it's normal to find it here since it also has a TI OMAP 2. And I think the Z10 wasn't in the benchmark since based on the same hardware it should have identical results.
JOIN THE DISCUSSION...
Please enter your name and leave your comment below
 
AD_MGU_Basementbanner
Ad_BriskMobile_iPhone_R1
POPULAR NEWS
LATEST COMMENTS
LATEST DEMOS
Ad_TheDumplingDimension_iPhone_LowerButton
LATEST VIDEOS
LATEST SCREENS