• arrow
    LOG IN 
    • Log in using an option below.
         
      Forgot password?
      Login with Facebook
      Sign in with Twitter

  • REGISTER
Close
ABOUT US
Contact Us Who Are We? Hall Of Fame Advertising With PG Games Archive
BEST GAMES
Best games on iPhone Best games on iPad Best games on Android
FREE STUFF
Best free games on iPhone Best free games on iPad Best free games on Android Competitions
GAME SALES
iPhone game sales iPad game sales Android game sales
UPDATED GAMES
Latest iPhone game updates Latest iPad game updates Latest Android game updates
NEW RELEASES
New iPhone games New iPad games New Android games
MORE PG SITES
PG.biz PG FRANCE PG Game Guides PG GameHubs PG Connects 2014
MORE SM SITES
AppSpy Free App Alliance 148 Apps Android Rundown iPhone Quality Index iPad Quality Index Android Quality Index Swipe Magazine Best App Ever Awards
PARTNERS
Metacritic
GameRankings
Pocket Gamer on NewsNow
GamesTracker
dx.net
UK Mobile Pages Directory
Skinflint Price Comparison
  header logo

 ANDROID NEWS

UK judge: Galaxy Tab 'not as cool' as iPad; does not infringe Apple's design patents

A pyrrhic victory?

Product: Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 | Manufacturer: Samsung
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 Android, thumbnail 1
Samsung won a court case (yet lost some face) today in the UK courts, as a judge has ruled that its Galaxy Tab series of tablets does not infringe Apple's tablet design patents.

While the decision has obviously pleased Samsung - which is currently fighting similar claims across the world's various courts - this pleasure will no doubt be tempered somewhat by the judge's reasoning for why customers won't confuse the iPad with a Galaxy Tab.

In the words of Judge Colin Birss, the Galaxy Tab family "[does] not have the same understated and extreme simplicity which is possessed by the Apple design. They are not as cool."

Put-down by humans

In more exact terms, the difference in size and thickness of the Galaxy Tab from Apple's touchscreen slate, plus the "unusual details" on the rear of Sammy's tablet, meant that The Big A's patent infringement claims were rejected.

Samsung (unlike every headline writer in the tech industry) chose not to focus on the judge's comments in its prepared press statement on Judge Birss's decision, instead preferring to issue a warning to Apple that its "excessive legal claims" were harming innovation in the industry.

Apple, meanwhile, issued a statement that managed to ignore both the judge's comment AND Samsung's response. The iPad manufacturer stated that it was "no coincidence that Samsung's latest products look a lot like the iPhone and iPad" and that it would continue to fight "to protect Apple's intellectual property".

Bloomberg
 

Reviewer photo
Will Wilson 9 July 2012
Have your say! Related stories  
Post a comment - Please log in to leave a comment
Pocket Gamer Biz     PG Login
Login with Facebook Sign in with Twitter
Show: Latest | Oldest
Joined:
Oct 2011
Post count:
17
Teaweasel | 09:38 - 11 July 2012
MetalSech... Well played. Well played
Joined:
Jul 2011
Post count:
502
aros | 09:33 - 11 July 2012
Samsung have stolen Apple's design to be fair. I say that as an XP owner.
Joined:
Jun 2012
Post count:
13
MetalSech | 20:31 - 9 July 2012
After making his comments, Judge Birss tried once more to solve his highly perplexing fit-the-shape-to-the-hole Fisher Price toy. But it wasn't simple enough.
POPULAR STORIES LATEST COMMENTS
LATEST NEWS
LATEST VIDEOS VIDEO REVIEWS