• arrow
    LOG IN 
    • Log in using an option below.
      Forgot password?
      Login with Facebook
      Sign in with Twitter

Contact Us Who Are We? Hall Of Fame Advertising With PG Games Archive
Best games on iPhone Best games on iPad Best games on Android
Best free games on iPhone Best free games on iPad Best free games on Android Competitions
iPhone game sales iPad game sales Android game sales
Latest iPhone game updates Latest iPad game updates Latest Android game updates
New iPhone games New iPad games New Android games
PG.biz PG FRANCE PG GERMANY PG Game Guides PG GameHubs PG Connects 2014
AppSpy Free App Alliance 148 Apps Android Rundown iPhone Quality Index iPad Quality Index Android Quality Index Swipe Magazine Best App Ever Awards
Pocket Gamer on NewsNow
UK Mobile Pages Directory
Skinflint Price Comparison

Opinion: The lack of a second stick is an XL mistake, Nintendo

Nintendo sticks to its guns with new 3DS XL model
Product: Nintendo 3DS XL | Publisher: Nintendo
Nintendo 3DS XL 3DS, thumbnail 1
Most of us could have guessed a new 3DS was on the way. It has become a long-held Nintendo tradition to follow up a hardware launch with a superior, revised model a year or so after the original's debut.

In light of the frankly bizarre Frankenstick Circle Pad Pro add-on, it seemed obvious to everyone with a face and at least one functioning eye that Nintendo would do the decent thing and release a model with a second stick. (We thought it might look like this).

But, no

Instead, Nintendo has decided to completely disregard overwhelming consumer feedback and simply make the existing device bigger.

After the company's recent E3 horror show, the last thing Nintendo really needed was to present its critics with even more ammunition, but the 3DS XL is perhaps Nintendo's biggest own goal in recent memory.

Nintendophiles will doggedly deny that the 3DS needs a second stick: "Hardly any games support a second stick, anyway", "the DS did just fine without one", "not having a second stick will stop lazy ports", "not adding a second stick will ensure existing owners won't be upset", "they can't change the fundamental design of the console." Et cetera.

These are all fair, reasonable points, but I'd argue that there are a lot of perfectly good reasons for adding one even at this early stage in the 3DS's life cycle.

For a start, having two sticks as standard opens up the 3DS to more types of games, including shooters and action adventures. As much as gyroscopic controls offer a neat alternative to camera movement in games like Resident Evil: Revelations, most players would take physical controls given the choice.

More control

It's fair to say that only a few other 3DS games have tangibly benefitted from the Circle Pad Pro add-on to date. But, rather than see this as a sign that there isn't any real hunger from publishers to make twin-stick games, it's more a case of risk-averse companies catering to the lowest common denominator.

Adding a second stick would have very quickly addressed the problem, and given publishers the confidence to produce games using the industry-standard control configuration.

Instead, Nintendo has essentially ensured that the PS Vita remains the only handheld gaming system that gives developers the choice of making games with true joypad-style controls.

Of course, it's true that the 3DS is indeed selling better than the PS Vita, which leads people to the conclusion that it really doesn't matter whether you meddle with the controls or not. If they mattered so much to people, wouldn't the 3DS be trailing in the Vita's wake right now?

Well, quite. But, if you were in Nintendo's shoes, wouldn't you want to make absolutely sure that the 3DS grinds the Vita into the dust by nullifying one of its advantages?

The other issue, of course, is that Nintendo has a lot more to worry about these days than just Sony. The onslaught of tablets and smartphones is a far bigger threat than Sony ever was, and Nintendo should be bending over backwards to make its handheld as broadly appealing as possible.

Don't give gamers an excuse to whinge. Make your product essential.

Home and away

There's also the unanswered question of 3DS and Wii U interoperability - if any. Given that the Wii U's tablet controller features, yes, two sticks, it would have made sense for a revised 3DS to match it for basic functionality and layout. For the sake of consistency, you know.

Before I get accused of knee-jerk negativity, I will admit there are a few positives to look forward to in the new 3DS model. The 3DS XL will boast an improved battery life, for one. You'll now get "3.5 - 6.5 hours" for 3DS titles, and "6 - 10 hours" for DS titles.

But, before anyone unfurls the bunting, that's a whole extra half an hour for 3DS, and between 1 and 2 extra hours for DS games - an improvement, yes, but still a long way from where most gamers would like it to be.

The biggest thumbs-up, perhaps, is reserved for the expanded screen size of the 3DS XL, with Nintendo boosting the original 3DS's dimensions by 90 per cent, making it the biggest screen ever on a Nintendo handheld and most likely a beautiful showcase for its 3D content.

Then again, the XL dimensions turn the 3DS from a pocket device into a portable device, and that's not necessarily right for everyone's needs.

No power

In one of the more baffling decisions in Nintendo's long and illustrious history, the 3DS XL will not come bundled with an AC adaptor.

That's fine if you happen to have an old DSi or 3DS charger lying around, but somewhat annoying if you don't. Cutting costs is one thing, but neglecting to provide basic fundamentals just eats away at customer satisfaction.

Given the imminent launch of the 3DS XL, there appears to be little chance that the 3DS will benefit from a significant revision in the near future. At best, a slimmer model may appear with (genuinely) better battery life, but it already feels like Nintendo would rather work on producing an entirely new handheld system than try to fiddle too much with an existing one.

Then again, considering the 3DS will only become a profitable system for Nintendo later this summer, it seems highly unlikely that it will bail out any time soon.

One day, we might enjoy a full-featured Nintendo handheld with everything we've been clamouring for. Decent battery life. Twin-stick controls. Visually stunning. Great online play.

We can but dream.

Reviewer photo
Kristan Reed 22 June 2012
Have your say!  
Post a comment - Please log in to leave a comment
Pocket Gamer Biz     PG Login
Login with Facebook Sign in with Twitter
Show: Latest | Oldest
Jun 2012
Post count:
Zin Win | 10:25 - 29 June 2012
You really should fix the Genre for this article.
May 2012
Post count:
wheathorse0 | 10:33 - 25 June 2012
I think the lack of a 2nd stick on the 3DS is a massive omission...it's the only thing that's stopped me from getting one. It's a real missed opportunity from Nintendo and should have been on the 3DS from birth. To fail to include it on a hardware update, ages after that horrible add-on thingy was launched, is madness.
A second analogue pad is the main reason I'll be getting a Vita soon. It's something I've wanted on a handheld for ages now and was disappointed that the PSP Go lacked and the Xperia Play's touchpads only half made up for.
Jun 2012
Post count:
Jay Mich | 06:42 - 24 June 2012
What kind of amateur fanboy article is this!? Put your toys back in your pram and go buy the circle pad if it's bothers you so much!
Jun 2012
Post count:
RealityBites | 06:04 - 24 June 2012
If Nintendo would have added a second stick, nearly every current 3DS owner would be up in arms over the fact that they now all have inferior 3DS's. They would have smaller versions of a now larger and more complete version. Not to mention the slidepad would be shunned for the original 3DS in favor of the newer 3DS XL. The 3DS XL is not an upgrade.
Jun 2012
Post count:
KuRiCobbY | 00:33 - 24 June 2012
This article is pretty misleading. If you're going to argue that Nintendo should've added a 2nd circle pad you should've argued against the main reason why it wasn't included.

Adding a 2nd circle pad to the XL would alienate everyone that bought the original 3DS (just over 1 year ago).

The XL isn't meant to be an upgrade - it's meant to be a different option.
Apr 2012
Post count:
jn2002dk | 14:39 - 23 June 2012
How on earth would they justify adding a 2nd circle pad to the XL?

You really dodge this issue which is obviously the reason why they didn't go with a 2nd pad

It would create massive confusion as a consumer and would likely result in future games forcing you to either buy the 2nd pad attachment or upgrade your 3ds. Screwing early adopters like that would be extremely poor business

Please, if you're going to write such a negative article at least argue your points. You're skipping all the cons of adding a 2nd pad and only focusing on why you think it would be a great idea. That's too easy
Feb 2012
Post count:
Axe99 | 13:42 - 23 June 2012
@WearyAmoeba - that's crazy logic, this was a great opportunity for Ninty to get in on the ground floor with twin-stick support, and make it worthwhile for devs to give it more support. Off the top of my head, genres that are much better with a second stick include third-person adventure/shooters/RPGs, first-person adventure/shooters/RPGs, twin-stick shooters and flight games. That's a lot of genres to be ceding quality controls over to the competition.

And don't write off the Vita on sales just yet - recent software releases suggest that it's a case of it building momentum. I'm yet to see one bad review of the Vita from someone that actually owns it, and have known of numerous people that weren't going to get it until they actually played it, and haven't looked back since. And, tbh, I much prefer the line-up the Vita has now, with far less time since launch, than the 3DS (noting that I'm not one for Ninty's approach to game design - if people like Ninty, they clearly should run with the 3DS (which is a great piece off kit), and would be insane not to :)).
Jun 2012
Post count:
Amacmac | 13:18 - 23 June 2012
WearyAmeoba attributing the vita's slow start to it having 2 sticks is stupid.
Jun 2012
Post count:
WearyAmoeba | 01:57 - 23 June 2012
I've never needed one either. I'd take it one step further. The vita has two sitcks and it caters to hard core gamers. It's also getting clobbered. Sales are anemic at best. I think that Nintendo has looked at how the HC gamer dream machine, the vita is selling and they've decided that they'll give those guys the twin stick shooters and do what they do on the 3ds.
Jun 2012
Post count:
paulthewall | 18:34 - 22 June 2012
I agree a second stickk would be great. However I've never needed a second stick for my 3DS. I've beaten RE Revelations, MGS3, and both worked fine using the face buttons as a second stick. I'm glad it will have a bigger screen. I've always felt it needed it.
JOIN THE DISCUSSION: 10 comments >>